| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height |
|---|---|
| From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:17:41 +0000 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Of course! But the OP specifically said: "single multiband beam 40 - 10. No stacks." Steve G3TXQ On 02/12/2011 14:59, K1TTT wrote: > That's what stacks are for! > > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] cushcraft D3W, Bert Almemo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] guys vs. falling limbs? Resp. by DAVIS RF Co., Stephen Davis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height, K1TTT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height, Jan Erik Holm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |