----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
To: "Michael Goins" <wmgoins@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effectivel Tower height
> The question that started this thread has as many answers as there are
> hams who put up antennas. My answer is an LP for 40-6 at 100 feet and a
> tribander at 47 feet on a gate, bent dipole array for 80 and quarter wave
> slopers for 160 from the top, Using the LP for the high bands and using
> the 160 quarterwave slopers as 80 meter reflectors keeps undesired
> interband interaction to a minimum. The tribander does very well as fillin
> and is great in contests. I sometimes use the LP and tribander as a
> "stack" with a variable phase box.
> Gene / W2LU
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|