Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Wall thickness?

To: Dino Darling <dino@kx6d.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Wall thickness?
From: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:34:33 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Yes, those broken tips are caused by the vibration fatigue failure  
which occurs when the elements "HUM" in the wind.   Damping them  
internally (rope is sometimes used) and capping the ends (or using  
silicone seal with a tiny drain hole) usually stops that problem  
before it occurs.
73
Don
N8DE

Quoting Dino Darling <dino@kx6d.com>:

> .058" is correct. The common tip thickness is .047". I'm not sure I've
> ever seen one at .03x".
>
> Using .047" is common because of less weight, cost, and it doesn't
> support another element...as stated. And yes, it DOES explain all the
> broken tips, especially in windy environments!
>
> Dino - KX6D
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Wall thickness?
> From: K7LXC@aol.com
> Date: Sat, July 14, 2012 1:39 pm
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
>
>
> Howdy -
>
> I'm fixing a couple of broken F12 elements and need to know what the
> typical wall thickness is for normal aluminum antenna elements. It seems
> to
> me that 0.058" is a number I've seen before but want to confirm that.
> Tnx.
>
> Cheers,
> Steve K7LXC
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>