I would think a full size Tx and Rx four square would work better due to size
and you can Tx on it.
For now I wanted something to hear better as I have other Tx avenues.
If I had the room, time and resouces I would build a 160 and 80 four square
that I can Tx on.
73-
W1JCW
John
From: john@kk9a.com
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:29 AM
To: TowerTalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4 Sq array Dx or Hi Z
That is great information, John.
I am curious if these work any better for receiving than a full sized
vertical TX four square?
John KK9A
To: <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] 4 Sq array Dx or Hi Z
From: "W1JCW" <w1jcw@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:15:43 -0500
Hi Z seems to have a better mouse trap when compared to Dxe.
The methods and how to handle RF from near by active elements is the key
and
since I run QRO and this is important as
many indicated this to be an issue with Dxe.
I was looking at a used 4 sq from Dxe but after checking into the Hi Z
packages
I will get more bang for the buck
in the long run.
73-
W1JCW
John
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|