Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox ??

To: Chris <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox ??
From: Bill Marx <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 13:30:06 -0400
List-post: <[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]>
In Florida our experience with Noalox is  better than Penetrox.

 Here Penetrox coated joints always seemed to corrode more in the salt 
atmosphere than Noalox. 

YMMV
Bill Marx W2CQ


Sent from my iPhone

On May 9, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't like the bottle the Noalox comes in, it's kinda flat and hard to get 
> any grease out of it when it starts to get low.  But that's pretty nit-picky.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> On May 9, 2013, at 11:20 AM, W1JCW wrote:
> 
>> I've not noticed any issues or differences between the two which I use both. 
>> 
>> 73-
>> W1JCW
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> From: John King 
>> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 11:38 AM
>> To: [email protected] 
>> Subject: [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox ??
>> 
>> 
>> Yesterday, I purchased Noalox at the locl Home Depot. In the past, I have 
>> used Penetrox when assembling HF beams and Penetrox worked great. Has anyone 
>> used Noalox to assemble aluminum tubing on HF beams. Please give me the 
>> benefit of your experience with Noalox if you have used it. Thanks and 73, 
>> John, K5PGW 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>