Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Rohn 25G

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:18:46 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rex Turvin <turvin2009@yahoo.com>
To: Ray Benny <rayn6vr@cableone.net>, Mark Robinson
<markrob@mindspring.com>

I am using a pier pin base because that is what my county requires. When 
looking at Rohn's manuals and drawings a tower section buried in the concrete 
is used for a self supporting tower max height 40'. Rohns manual for guyed 
towers only shows a pier pin base, therefore the county will not allow me to 
use the tower section in the base. I argued that the foindation was stronger 
but a no go. I must use what the county will sign off on.
73 NR6M


##  You might want to ph or email rohn...and explain it to them.   Im  sure 
they would fax an ok, that a base embedded in concrete  meets their specs.   
But if base is embedded, the legs have to sit on 
some sand or gravel 1st... big enough not to plug the leg holes.   Water has to 
be able to drain.   Otherwise the legs will fill with water, freeze, legs 
split,  all hell breaks loose. 

Jim  VE7RF
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G, Jim Thomson <=