Don't reinvent the wheel...use this recipe:
http://www.k6if.com/40dip/40dip.html
Chris
KF7P
On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Mark, K5ER wrote:
> Hi Guys, I have checked the archives, but not found specific answers, so
> forgive me if this has already been covered and I am asking the wrong
> questions. To help a friend, I am building a 40 meter rotatable dipole, to
> live at 90' on his mast. It will be about 12' above his 36' boom 20M OWA. I
> will fabricate a heavy duty mount/center insulator, and incorporate 2 truss
> cables, either dacron or kevlar.
> He delivered to me two (used) elements from a previous unidentified antenna.
> Each element is abt 28' long, with the taper schedule going from 1 1/4 down
> to 5/8. I have spare material in stock, so I could easily add a 1/2" x 5' tip
> to each and end up with a full size dipole.
>
> Question one - The price of material isn't much more, so why does it seem
> that "nobody" builds rotatable dipoles to the full 66-67 feet?
>
> Question two - IF a shortened antenna is better, is there a "better" length?
> I see many in the range from 38 to 55 feet.
>
> Question three - If shortened, I know the ant will be capacitive, and
> therefore can be matched by adding an inductor across the feed. I find many
> pages of formula with lots of Latin characters, but missed that day in math
> class. If someone had a hint of a starting point, ie> 4" long, 5 turns on 2"
> diam. , or 4 turns on 3" diam, etc. I could then work backwards and make this
> work for him.
>
> I have EZnec 5+, but have only used it to build OWA antenna so far, which
> makes a beautiful direct feed, so I have no experience with adding a load. I
> plan to input the taper schedule into EZnec, but if a given length is known
> to be superior, I am not too proud to ask for it, rather than spend hours
> building model after model working my way through the possibilities.
>
> I understand that height can affect performance and feed point impedance,
> however, neither the owner nor I climb. I need to model and build this
> antenna, and then expect it to work as modeled when the climber puts it in
> place, so any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark, K5ER
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|