Hi,
I agree that's the best way to measure Vf and have the right length of cable
for a 1/4 or 1/2 line.
However, having a longer cable run is not always desirable as it may increase
losses and and produce a broader measurement peak.
It all depends on the work frequency and lambda multiples...
About VNA and antenna analysers, the product below is not a VNA and seems to be
limited to SWR measurements, however it is dirt cheap.
Two options : connected via a PC or via Bluetooth (reading with an Android
tablet).
http://www.foxdelta.com/products/aaz.htm
73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://www.qscope.org/ (Free log analysis tools)
Le 13 nov. 2013 à 06:02, towertalk-request@contesting.com a écrit :
>
> The most accurate method to determine Vf and/or electrical length of a
> piece of transmission line is to measure it as a stub near the frequency
> where you care about its length. You can use TDR by the FFT method Jim
> describes, but the number you get will be for the frequency range where
> you have swept it, typically 100 MHz - 500 MHz. That's good enough for
> cutting precisely equal lengths of coax cut from the same roll, and
> maybe even of the same type if it's from a high quality manufacturer,
> but it's not good enough for coax with different part numbers, or from
> companies with poor manufacturing consistency.
>
> Simple analyzers like the MFJ-259 are plenty good enough for finding the
> resonances in a stub if you read the null very carefully. I've done
> that by finding the zero reactance frequency, then finding the
> frequencies just either side where the digit changes from zero
> reactance, and take the average of the two, which should be quite close
> to the first center reading. I then carefully measure the physical
> length of the sample with a tape measure.
>
> BTW -- the best bargain, by far, in a VNA is the VNWA 3e designed by
> DG8SAQ, built and sold by a UK ham. It's USB powered, runs via software
> from the USB port, full specs to 500 MHz, reduced dynamic range to 1.5
> GHz, delivered to my door by post for $700 with calibration load and
> short. It does TDR by the FFT method Jim Lux described, and can be used
> as a spectrum analyzer. It reads and writes Touchstone files for use by
> Smith Chart and other design software. Control software is by DG8SAQ,
> who a university prof, and is being updated regularly to add features.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> Jim, K9YC's comments on how to use an antenna analyzer are a valid and a
> useful alternative to determining the length of cables. I would think for a
> long cable run more accuracy would be experienced if a spectrum well below
> the antenna resonance is chosen.
>
> I have been accustomed at using the old school TDR approach from my days as
> a CATV engineer. But I also have a MiniVNA which will accomplish the same
> thing as Jim describes.
>
> One would still have to calculate each leg separate from the other to
> determine the difference in branch cable lengths. If the delta is <20
> degrees, I probably wouldn't make any changes on a two bay array spaced a
> 1/2 wave (not the best spacing for gain), or more apart (better).
>
> Ray, W4BYG
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|