Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] K9YC vertical dipole test....

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] K9YC vertical dipole test....
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:21:54 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 11/14/2013 8:49 AM, John Frazier wrote:
Jim....

I noted the "simple" vertical half-wave dipole configuration on your site. Is this the type used in your test?

Yes

Also, do you feel the choking is sufficient to "eliminate" the rest of the feed-line past the end of the other half of the dipole from radiating as part of the dipole?

Yes, if the choke is properly designed and wound for the frequency of interest.

Have you ever done comparisons with your "simple" config vs. "standard" config?

I don't know of a practical center feed for a vertical dipole that does not include a serious common mode choke at the feedpoint. Indeed, I consider my method FAR superior (and easier to do) than the more conventional method of using wires for both sides of the dipole and running coax horizontally away from the antenna. Try modeling it (including the feedline as a common mode element) and you'll see why. :)

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>