Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 02:02:43 +0100
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Reading is believing?

I am very happy that I own a Mosley beam CL33 and not a Moseley.
But if identical yagis are meant, my dipoles probably have far less then one
percent efficiency.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013 23:43
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR

On 12/3/2013 8:29 AM, Doug Scribner wrote:
> Thanks for all the responses... 

Before investing any more time and money in the Moseley, I STRONGLY 
suggest that you buy and study the report by N0AX and K7LXC on a dozen 
or so tri-banders, including two Moseleys. The executive summary is that 
they were VERY poor performers -- like less gain than a dipole at the 
same location and height, and over the same path. Order the report from 
K7LXC's website.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>