Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower HDX-589MDPL UP/DOWN switch failure

To: k2cb@comcast.net, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower HDX-589MDPL UP/DOWN switch failure
From: Drax Felton <draxfelton@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:48:14 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have been nothing but disappointed with the electronics in mine too.

Sent from Outlook




On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:34 PM -0700, <k2cb@comcast.net> wrote:










I recently had an interesting issue with my HDX-589MDPL tower.  I am posting my 
experience, hoping it saves someone from a potentially catastrophic event. 
We had a rather intense storm rip through the Philadelphia suburbs last week, 
so on the side of caution, I made the wise decision to run outside and lower my 
tower down somewhat before the storm approached my area to the east.  Good 
decision - we had numerous trees down and a few broken power poles, 
resulting in a 30 hour power outage.......... But the tower and antennas made 
it through unscathed. 
  
However, as I was retracting the tower, once it reached my desired level, I 
went to place the UP/OFF/DOWN toggle switch in the OFF position.  However, the 
tower kept moving in the downward direction. In a panic, I flipped the switch 
up, then back down to the OFF position, which made no change. Fortunately 
the GFI outlet was within reach, so I simply tripped the GFI test button to 
stop the tower.  Upon resetting the GFI outlet, even with the switch in the OFF 
position, I heard a loud buzz emanating from the tower motor. Not good. 
However, if moved the switch to the UP position, the tower would move up, 
but going back to OFF, the tower would still continue moving up.  I had to pull 
the power cord or trip the GFI outlet to stop the tower. 
  
Fortunately,  I had the tower down to a safe level. The storm was fast 
approaching, so I called it a day and figured I would investigate further the 
next day........... 
  
In the meantime, I placed a call to US Tower. One of their electricians kindly 
returned my call, explained the design of the control box, and emailed me a 
block diagram. 
  
The next day, once power was restored, I did some troubleshooting.  While the 
tower was moving in the downward direction, the lower limit switch was tested, 
and the tower was able to be stopped by manually engaging the lower limit 
switch.  However, when performing the same test in the upward direction, the 
upper limit switch had no effect, and the tower continued to move upward. 
Fortunately I performed these tests with the tower somewhere around halfway up, 
so it was not much of a concern at the time. However, had I decided to fully 
extend the tower, the results could have been disastrous! 
  
Next, I decided to pull the cover off the control box on the side of the tower. 
  
The motor and limit switches are controlled via the toggle switch, which is a 
3PDT center off switch made by Carling Technologies.  Two of the poles are used 
to reverse the phasing of the motor direction control leads, and the third pole 
is used to supply the main neutral feed to the motor. The main hot lead is hard 
wired to the motor at all times. The center of this third pole feeds the motor, 
the up side connects to the return from the upper limit switch, and the down 
side of the switch connects to the return from the lower limit switch. Both 
limit switches are hard wire fed from the AC supply neutral. The limit switches 
each provide their own neutral path back to the toggle switch. The toggle 
switch simply selects which limit switch is in effect at the time. The upper 
limit switch is in effect when the switch is in the up position, and the lower 
limit switch is in effect when the switch is in the down position. When the 
tower is NOT at either limit, both limit switches are conducting a neutral 
return back to the toggle switch.   
  
Now here is where things get bad real quick - in my case, the common terminal 
and the lower terminal of the third pole of my switch failed in a SHORTED 
condition!  Basically, the motor was connected to neutral at all times via the 
lower limit switch. Thus the reason the tower would move in the proper 
direction once the switch was thrown up or down, but would not stop once turned 
off. Also, if left in the OFF position, and power was applied to the AC cord, 
the motor would buzz due to lack of direction control lead supply, while main 
hot and neutral were now immediately present at the time of plug-in.  
  
Fortunately, I was moving in a downward direction when the switch decided to 
fail shorted in the DOWN direction. Had I fully lowered the tower, the lower 
limit switch would have still taken effect and broken the neutral path.  
However, had I decided to raise the tower with this switch failure condition, 
the upper limit switch would have been of no use, as the lower limit switch was 
still in the circuit, supplying the neutral return at the same time as the 
upper limit switch!  I surely would be telling a different story at this 
point!  
  
I tested further and made sure the limit switches themselves were ok, and that 
the motor was still functioning properly. I then began the search for a 
replacement toggle switch. 
  
The next day I ran over to my nearest Grainger Supply warehouse, where I was 
able to pick up an exact replacement switch. 
  
For future reference, the switch is a CARLING TECHNOLOGIES HM254-73 3PDT 
ON-OFF-ON SWITCH.    It is also available from Mouser for a few bucks less 
before shipping, but I wanted it right away. 
  
I installed the switch in short order. UST did a nice job of using spade lugs 
on all of the wires, and the switch uses brass screw terminals. $25 and a few 
hours later I had the tower tested and back to normal operation.   
  
Looking over the wiring diagram for the control box after the fact, I am 
questioning why UST did not just simply wire the two limit switches in series, 
then just use the UP/DOWN toggle switch to break the connection between the 
series-wired limit switches and the motor. This way, both limit switches are 
always inline when the circuit is completed, and in the event of a switch 
failure such as I just experienced, both limit switches would still function at 
all times, regardless of motor switch direction, thus avoiding a potentially 
catastrophic event. If the toggle switch were to fail shorted, at least either 
limit switch could break the neutral return path regardless of the switch 
direction. 
  
Summary: Do yourself a favor and regularly test the toggle and limit switches 
as part of your routine maintenance inspections......................... 
  
Eric 
K2CB 
  
  
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>