My feeling is that the antenna manufacturer is the one to get the stacking
distance data. From there one can use HFTA to get an approximation of stack
hight.
Randy N1KWF
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:13 PM, john@kk9a.com <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
> I am saying that HFTA is not a good tool for modeling stacking distances.
> I also disagree with your max distance stacking numbers.
>
> Sent from my Smartphone.
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <
> richard@karlquist.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 8/9/2016 7:03 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> >
> >> I have no HFTA experience however after looking at the stacking
> distances
> >> from people that have used it I would not recommend it. It puts the
> beams
> >> way too close together in my opinion.
> >>
> >> John KK9A
> >>
> >> high for you! I've stuck with the M2 recommendations - and have in
> >> modeling confirmed they work well. That is 60' on 20 and 45' on 15. The
> >>
> >> Gary
> >> K9RX
> >>
> >>
> > According to my modelling, 60' on 20 and 45' on 15 are near the
> > MAXIMUM stacking distances, being nearly a wavelength. Did I
> > misunderstand what you were saying?
> >
> > Rick N6RK
> >
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
--
Randy Lake N1KWF
73 Gunn Rd.
Keene,NH
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|