To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Stacking question - another reality data point |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:17:06 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On Thu,8/11/2016 12:35 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: EZNEC using "real ground" says such a phasing system is not worth the time/effort. Remember, the ground reflection is always out of phase with the "real" antenna so any phase difference one applies to the higher antennas in the stack is offset by the opposite phasefrom the ground reflections. Yep. Real world conditions are far more complex than simplified "free space" models. And, of course, NEC code is written for flat homogeneous earth, another (over?) simplification. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Stacking question - another reality data point, Joe Subich, W4TV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Weight on ends of a OCF diploe, Chuck Gooden |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Stacking question - another reality data point, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking question - another reality data point, Chuck Dietz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |