Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not?
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:00:05 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The guy bracket on larger towers is u-bolted to the tower leg and bracing,
it does not encircle the tower. It is not necessary to encircle the tower.
My Rohn guy brackets look like this
https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/roh-ga65gd

John KK9A


To:     towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:        Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not?
From:   "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:16:30 -0500


Although it's a common practice with hams, Guys should be attached to a
bracket, not individual tower legs. It's not normally a problem, but guy
brackets like ROHN sells puts no strain on an individual tower leg. On a
heavily loaded tower,(near its wind load limit), when the guys are
attached to individual tower legs, in high winds, the tower leg on the
windward side takes the strain. With a guy bracket encircles the tower
with the guy strain taken by the bracket and converted to a downward
force, putting far less strain on the tower.

You don't see commercial towers with the guy wrapped around a leg.

73, Roger (K8RI)

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>