| To: | Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive |
| From: | W4AAW Mike Lonneke via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | W4AAW Mike Lonneke <W4AAW@aol.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Feb 2017 07:10:24 -0500 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
No matter what you do, Judge Robarts will rule that the illegal climber has a Constitutional right to trespass and climb your tower. He will be upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. You don't have the authority to keep trespassers from climbing your tower and, you have not cited any examples that show that people who did not climb were not injured! HI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive, Roger (K8RI) on TT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] W4AAW Mike lonneke comment Re: climbing, Earl Wesner |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive, Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive, Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |