Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Fall Zone

To: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fall Zone
From: RCM <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:38:30 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

> On Jul 9, 2019, at 12:16, JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I see the "fall zone" issue as more of a political or social issue. 

--------------
> 
> A properly engineered and constructed ham tower can be made just as safe as
> any other vertical structure.  There is no logical reason to single them
> out for "fall zone" concerns.
> 
> 73 Jim K6OK
> _______________________________________________


There’s the problem, “properly engineered”.

We hope percentage of stupid in ham radio is less the the rest of society, 
but…..

The local with a tribander on 50’ of Rohn 25, with no guys. It would have done 
his neighbor’s house and car. He did take it down, after two years.

“You have to use an antenna tuner, on six meters, to get the SWR out of the 
antenna."

The guy giving s-meter reports to everyone he works… on the repeater.

Sorry for starting the list.


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>