Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 EF-240 SWR shift

To: Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 EF-240 SWR shift
From: Richard Thorne <rthorne@rthorne.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:20:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The hairpin is a good place to start.  The weak point is the ring terminals 
used to attach the coil to the feed point bolts.  I found the hairpin coil 
laying near the base of my tower.  The winds here finally one.

I used heavier ring terminals during the repair, so far so good.

Rich - N5ZC

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 16, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> To be clear, just because the SWR gets better lower in frequency (to a 50
> Ohm input) doesn't mean something has lengthened.  It just means that a
> frequency dependent impedance has shifted lower in frequency to give the
> desired match.
> 
> 
> 
> My guess is that the hairpin coil has started to rust and has added
> resistance but is still connected.  You could test that theory a bit by
> putting a carrier on it for 30 seconds and see if the SWR moves.  Or the
> balun could have a similar defect.
> 
> 
> 
> As KK9A said, if the loading wires disconnected or the hairpin disconnected,
> the response would be typically a higher shift rather than lower.
> 
> 
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>