Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material
From: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:28:32 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
This has been an interesting tangential discussion but I would like to now 
bring it back to my original question......  :-)

So far, taking into account the tolerance caveats, the consensus seems to be to 
use 31 material going forward rather than 77 material.

I prefer to use large ferrite beads that fit on the coax – roughly 1/2” ID -  
1” OD  x 1 1/4” height and then tape the beads in place in physical proximity  
to each other next to the feedpoint.

All coaxial cables used for 4 –square phasing lines are cut for an electrical 
1/4 wavelength   (RG11 Foam)
All coaxial feedlines from the antenna to the radio are cut for a multiple of 
an electrical 1/2 wavelength.  (RG213 or Buryflex)
For the 40 meter wirebeam I use an electrical 1/2 wavelength of RG8X followed 
by 1 wavelength of Buryflex.

In order to provide enough resistance adequate for an effective choke,  how 
many 31 beads should I used on each phasing line or feedline for

1.8 mhz?
3.6 mhz?
7.1 mhz?
14 mhz?
21 mhz?
28 mhz?

That is for the feedlines and the phasing lines.  But what I have also read is 
that I should also be using ferrite beads at the amp input and amp output.  
Have I understood this correctly?  Should I then also use beads at the output 
of the radio?  Should these beads also be 77 material?

Is there any issue if the antenna beads are one type of material (43) and then 
you use 77 material for the amp/radio inputs/outputs?

Thanks in advance for your help!

73

Bob  KQ2M
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>