Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] OWA Yagis was 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading wit

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] OWA Yagis was 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils
From: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 21:31:46 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
A 3 element beam puts the feedpoint near the center and likely within grasp for a bit of tweaking from the mast.  I view it as the right tool for the job.  An OWA is a good pick for the wide band HF.  And it is not a good pick for WARC.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


On 5/3/20 6:50 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
True, however unless you have a good way to model the hairpin, an OWA is
easier build since it will work with little if any adjusting.

John KK9A


Jeff Blaine AC0C wrote:

30m full size + 4-element 17m combo that uses a conventional hairpin
match on both bands.  The 12m is a similar hairpin matched type.  The
WARC bands are so narrow vs. the frequency that you don't run into the
issues that we have on much wider bands.

My other antennas for the conventional HF bands are OWA type. And that
is for all the reasons mentioned prior.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>