Hi Charlie,
Thank you for sharing your experiences on question #4.
73
Bob KQ2M
From: Charles Morrison
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 4:53 PM
To: kq2m@kq2m.com
Cc: Jeff Blaine ; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square question Part III and NEW questions Part IV
Near broken guys - No problem
My 80M 4-SQ have been around two different tower , each with varied guying. One
even had no insulators on the bottom guy.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:50 PM <kq2m@kq2m.com> wrote:
Hi,
I want to thank K0PJ/9, W9PL, AC0C, W6RMK, W7VJ and VE9AA for your
willingness to help and all the valuable information and insight!
Sorry for the delay in my response but I have been working day and night
professionally and in clearing woods, building antennas, etc. The limited
daylight now is another large factor. ;-)
I have some new questions and would appreciate your insight and help:
1) In the past I have used 1/4 wavelength ELEVATED radials for my 80 meter
wire 4-square but AC0C mentioned that it would be beneficial to use radials
that were NOT 1/4 wavelength. Should the radials be longer? Shorter? By how
much? I assume that all the ELEVATED radials be the same length regardless of
what fraction of wavelength is used – is that correct?
2) An old 4-square has 1/4 wavelength wire elements that have grown into the
trees. There is no way to get them down but I can cut a small length off of
them so that they are non-resonant and not attached to anything. Will that be
okay or is there going to be a problem with them causing interaction if these
elements are within 1/2 wavelength of the new wire 4-square with ELEVATED
radials?
3) The only place the feedpoint of my 160 Inv L can go on my property is
about 120’ - 130’ from the nearest feedpoints of the wire elements of my 80
meter 4-square and probably somewhat closer to the elevated radials. Is this
going to cause a significant interaction problem? I can ensure that the
elevated radials of the 160 Inv L do not cross those of the elevated radials of
the 80 Inv L if that would help. Would that help?
4) The SW element of the 80 meter 4square will be within 5’-10’ feet of the
guy wires of my 130’ tower from four ropes will support the elements of the
wire 4-square. The guy wires are broken up into non-resonant lengths with
insulators as follows starting from the tower 4’, 4’, 4’, 16’, 16’, 28’, 28’,
28’. The NW and NE elements will be about 15’ away from the guy wires.
Will this be enough to prevent interaction with the tower guys or will the
4-square radiation pattern be adversely impacted?
Thanks in advance for your insights and help!
73
Bob KQ2M
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Blaine
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2020 4:51 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square question Part III
Bob,
My 2 cents here. There is a practical answer and an ideal answer to the
"which direction do my radials point."
My answer is that you space them so that they are not overlapping and
share the maximum separation with respect to the feed & with each
other. I also choked on both ends of the feed my verts to try to
contain the elements and the radials as the only intentional radiators.
Opinions vary as to this need but I'm personally a big believer in
conductive elements participating in the antenna thing unless you do
something to prevent that in advance.
On the other hand, unless you specifically measure the actual radials
and use a length somewhat off of 1/4 wl exactly, then the result is
almost certainly that one of the radials will hog the current and that
will bend your pattern on that one vertical.
So one answer is that it does not matter, and the other answer is that
it matters a lot if you want to peel the onion back another layer and go
for a more optimized installation. The problem with that is the benefit
of doing it in a more complicated way is probably lost on most guys
anyway because the improvements are not determinable in advance. A 4SQ
is a magical beast that will work "good enough" even with terrible
compromises and construction - where an optimized one is not really
appreciated because most hams don't have a way of doing a before/after
sort of evaluation.
Good luck!
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com
On 10/31/20 3:31 PM, jimlux wrote:
> On 10/31/20 12:11 PM, kq2m@kq2m.com wrote:
>> I want to thank KK9A, NA6O, W4EF, SM2EKM, DCharing (callsign?) and
>> W6RMK, for all of their guidance, comments and links to helpful
>> sites. Greatly appreciated as always!
>>
>> Now for the final question... let’s say that the “positions” of the
>> Gauge 12 or 14 THHN wire 4-square elements are N, E, S, and W,
>> arranged in a box with the sides broadside to NE, SE, SW, and NW and
>> all the elements will all have either 3 or 4 elevated radials. I
>> will be using the Comtek ACB4 (80) phasing box fed with each element
>> fed with 1/4 wavelengths of RG11 foam coax. (It’s the same phasing
>> box I have been using for the past 25 years).
>>
>> Does it matter what directions the radials are pointing for each
>> element?
>
>
> Not really - what the radial(s) do is provide a return path for the
> current that "intercepts" the ground - and reduce "ground loss"
> (independent of the "counterpoise" function).
>
> The elements themselves are assumed omni directional. And it's only
> some some sort of extreme cases (1 radial) that there's a more than
> trivial effect on the directionality of the radiation pattern of a
> single element. What changes is the efficiency (i.e. the loss
> resistance gets lower as the number of radials increases).
>
> In the usual 4SQ "current forcing" array with 3/4 wavelength feed
> lines, the current in the element (which is what radiates) is the
> right ampliude and phase to form the beam.
>
>
> So let’s say I am using the NE position on the ACB-4 controller, since
> I am radiating on all 4 elements, does it matter what directions the
> radials are pointing? Do I want to have the same radial directions
> with all 4 elements or do I want to spread out the radial directions
> differently on each element? Since NE is by far the most important
> direction for me (Europe), do I want to have more radials pointing NE
> or broadside NE or equally spread out so that the radiation and
> current return is more uniform? I am not clear on any of this or if
> it is even important so I would appreciate any guidance that you can
> provide!
>>
>> My understanding is that I want to get the radials at least .05
>> wavelength above ground so at least 13’ above ground. Is that correct?
>>
>> Tnx & 73
>>
>>
>> Bob, KQ2M
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jimlux
>> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 8:44 AM
>> To: towertalk@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square question
>>
>> On 10/22/20 9:45 PM, Michael Tope wrote:
>>> Bob,
>>>
>>> I found this by googling "4 square 8 directions":
>>>
>>> https://ncjweb.com/bonus-content/k3lc4squarea.pdf
>>>
>>> I think W8JI describes something similar on his website.
>>>
>>> 73, Mike W4EF....................
>>>
>>>
>>
>> and that 4 square handbook from the DF6QV.. He's got all possible boxes
>> and phasing
>> http://tm1o.free.fr/4SQ/80m/en_ver_final4-sq_03_04_15.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 10/22/2020 7:39 PM, kq2m@kq2m.com wrote:
>>>> I really want to thank Jim, Jeff, Les, Mike, John and Gary for all of
>>>> their help, answers and ideas to which I have been giving a lot of
>>>> thought this week. The information gleaned has made me confident of
>>>> the new design. Unfortunately there is no way to avoid putting the
>>>> 4-square elements around the tower so I know that interaction effects
>>>> will likely be noticed. Vicious storms have taken down all the other
>>>> tall trees that were previously in use to support my 80 meter
>>>> 4-square.
>>>>
>>>> Note to Jim Lux – I am particularly intrigued by your idea of changing
>>>> the feeding of the elements so that I can radiate broadside from the
>>>> side of the array rather than on the diagonal since the only trees
>>>> that I have to support elements happen to be roughly N, E, S and West,
>>>> which, with the Comtek phasing box, would give me radiation N, E, S
>>>> and West rather than the desired NE, SE, SW and NW.
>>>>
>>>> The Comtek ACB-4 outdoor box uses the NW element in Pos 1 on the
>>>> outdoor , NE (2), SE (3) and SW in position 4 and arranged as shown in
>>>> the .pdf:
>>>>
>>>> www.static.dxengineering.com/pdf/comtek_4_square_info.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Which elements (N, E, S, W) would you put in which positions on the
>>>> box (so that the 4-square radiates toward the NE instead of East?
>>>>
>>>> How is the gain and F/B and F/S compared to the standard pattern that
>>>> radiates diagonally?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tnx to all & 73!
>>>>
>>>> Bob KQ2MTowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|