Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 230, Issue 9

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 230, Issue 9
From: Don Solberg <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:46:28 -0600
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
I have both the original NANOVNA and a NANOVNA-F.  The NanoVNA-F has a
larger screen and a metal case.  I really like it.

73,

Don K9AQ

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:00 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. NanoVNA Guidance (Richard Bell)
>    2. Re: NanoVNA Guidance (Jim Brown)
>    3. NanoVNA Guidance (Dennis OConnor)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:47:38 -0600
> From: Richard Bell <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I?m looking to acquire a NanoVNA device but I?m undecided about which
> one.  Seems like there are a number of choices out there but I?m just
> undecided about the advantages of one over another.
>
> I?m looking for suggestions from this group since I have seen them
> mentioned several times in the past.
>
> Thanks for any and all responses. This list is a great resource.
>
> 73 W5BXE Richard
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:17:33 -0800
> From: Jim Brown <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance
> Message-ID:
>         <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 2/9/2022 10:47 AM, Richard Bell wrote:
> > I?m looking to acquire a NanoVNA device but I?m undecided about which
> one.
>
> Not a NanoVNA, but far superior, for 7 years, I've been using a VNWA3EC
> designed by EE prof DG8SAQ, built by some hams in the UK, and using his
> software and firmware. Very well supported both by Tom and the UK hams
> via an email reflector.
>
> https://www.sdr-kits.net/VNWA-3EC
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Dennis OConnor <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] NanoVNA Guidance
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I have been happy with the NanoVNA-H4
>
> Type that into the search bar at amazon.com.
>
> Doc / k8do
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 230, Issue 9
> *****************************************
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 230, Issue 9, Don Solberg <=