| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Different dipole design |
| From: | Jim Brown <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Dec 2024 13:28:37 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:[email protected]> |
On 12/23/2024 12:13 PM, David Gilbert wrote: And his modeling (correctly in my opinion) shows the bandwidth to be wider with the additional capacitive loading that his version has versus just drooped wire extensions. Studied the file. Very nice design, Stan! An example of what I would call very good engineering -- an effective solution to solve a specific practical application and limitations. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Items for sale - Top Ten/DXEngineering, JOHN OWENS via TowerTalk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Different dipole design, W3AB via TowerTalk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Different dipole design, David Gilbert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Different dipole design, W3AB via TowerTalk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |