VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] The September Contest summary k1WHS

To: "'Dave Olean'" <K1WHS@metrocast.net>, <newsvhf@mailman.qth.net>, "'VHF Contesting'" <VHFcontesting@Contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] The September Contest summary k1WHS
From: David R Buckwalter via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: K3SK@buckwalter.co
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:15:52 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Dave,

All in all it looks like you did pretty well.   When I checked the HB9Q 222 
chat page I couldn't believe I missed all the western and the HI stations.   It 
really bummed me to see they "had been" logged into the page.   I could have 
used the multipliers.

As far as not being answered by loud digital stations, I also experienced quite 
a bit of it also.   I had more than a few instances of +level signal levels 
that I could not get to respond.   I think it’s a combination of things like 
poor receiver specs, not rotating thier antenna and adjacent RX signal 
interference on their end.   I saw many instances of signals piled on top of 
each other making them all near impossible to decode. To avoid that happening 
to me I make a point to change my TX df often.   And,  along the lines of 
stations piled up on the same df, there are more than a few who over drive 
their audio and splatter the waterfall with interference making decoded 
difficult.   There is a (to remain unnamed) ham 200 miles south of me that 
almost every contest severely overdrives his FT8 audio on 222 & 432 to a point 
that I cannot decode anyone within 400 to 500hz of his signal on the waterfall. 
 When I turn down the gain to minimize the issue, it also minimizes reception 
of everyone else.   Pointing this out to him has not helped.  I've even sent 
him screen captures.   

I wish I could log even half your 222 & 432 stations.   I'm pretty sure I could 
if they pointed their antennas my way.   

Dave - K3SK

"Regardless of what you've read on the internet, FM07 is not an RF Free Zone.   
Point this way and check it out."




-----Original Message-----
From: VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting-bounces+k3sk=buckwalter.co@contesting.com> 
On Behalf Of Dave Olean
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 5:22 PM
To: newsvhf@mailman.qth.net; VHF Contesting <VHFcontesting@Contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] The September Contest summary k1WHS

Hello VHF ops and VHF phreaques,

I saw a few interesting things over the contest weekend. One look at the 
Hepburn map showed that propagation would be very marginal, and that turned out 
to be very true. I heard lots of complaints. It was sobering with no 
propagation lift to help.  I noted that being on only 222 and
432 poses a few problems for running the bands. I can't pick up stations on 50 
or 144 and then "run the bands".  Yes it is my own fault, but I am still 
clearing wreckage from the last 144 antenna farm.  Waiting on 222 or 432 and 
trying to catch people 'passing through" is almost impossible.  I called AF1T 
at several times but never could get him to notice as he was gone the 
millisecond after completing his contact and moving to the next band. The fact 
that he was 59+20 did not help me. 
Stations that are S4 or S5 are impossible with these circumstances. They do not 
listen nor hear me and are gone to some other band.  That leaves sitting at the 
computer and watching chat pages to dredge up contacts. I did try calling CQ on 
SSB and a bit on CW, but that was very unproductive. I really have no idea how 
to operate the contest and still have fun. I love analog contacts but the 
numbers are decreasing. The big guns now have four or five bands operating 
simultaneously on FT8 even if they are single ops. This maximizes FT8 contacts 
as the exchange is slower than molasses in January, so having four or five band 
signals at once can speed things up quite a bit. I went snooping around the 
chat pages looking for stations to try with. It is very slow and hit or miss, 
but that was the only routine that seems to work. CQing sure does not work on 
222 or 432.   I remember 20 years ago we had a multi op station and actually 
called CQ on 1296 and it was productive.  Things are sure different today.

I missed many contacts with a few rovers as they would never respond to my 
requests for a sked. I think the problem is that they are very busy pointing 
their antennas to the populated areas and have their hands full with action 
there, so do not turn their beams elsewhere and cut their score.  Pointing to 
the populated areas will increase your score much faster than trying to work 
someone 180 degrees away.  I missed several grids because of that. Some rovers 
were easy to find and responsive. I want to single out VA3TEC/R. I am not sure 
what Mike was doing there with his rover-mobile, but he was exceptionally loud 
on the two bands that I worked him. I caught him in FN04 and FN14 on both 222 
and 432. IN each case he would respond to a request for a sked even though my 
beam heading was not very productive. His major action area was SOUTH I was 
East! Signals on both 222 and 432 were monstrous. Congrats, Mike.

I found conditions to be flat for the most part, but i did see a few bright 
spots. On Saturday evening, N3MK was blasting in from Eastern Shore of Virginia 
and FM27 between 0130 and 0200 UT. He was on FT8 and was very loud. On Sunday 
evening I heard a few stations calling him, but could not even detect him then. 
  I did try working VA3IKE on 222 MHz on Saturday evening and was surprised to 
work him with Q65B digi mode. He was at -20, which is pretty good for  his 25 
watts. That is an insane distance of 600 miles for 25 watts on 222 MHz. I think 
Ike religiously uses antenna wax on his antenna.   Other observations were the 
missing grids that are always bugging me. No one was worked from FN33 that 
abuts my grid square. On 222 MHz I missed four grids that border my own grid. 
I did manage to work the other four grid squares that border FN43. 
(FN42, FN32, FN34, and FN44 I missed quite a few easily workable grids due to 
lack of activity.  Others went missing because I could never find the station 
to even try in the first place. KE8FD and N8LRG are two that I would love to 
try but never got a chance. I missed EN80 on 222 and 432. I think I had a good 
chance on 222.

Now for the good news and positive results. I concentrated on working grids on 
222 and had a good result picking off the grids that are extremely far away. I 
worked K3SK and W7JW in FM07 and EN82 via EME on Sunday morning. Other stations 
worked then via EME were W4NH EM84, K9MRI EN70, W6TCP CM83, W7TZ CM97, and NH6Y 
in BL10  N4QWZ in TN was worked via meteors on Sunday evening. I was amazed 
that eight stations were worked via the Moon on Sunday morning in a very short 
period of time. 
Every contact was quick with no problem with Faraday rotation. W8ZN in
FM09 was worked on 222 & 432 on CW. VE3ZV was worked from EN92 on SSB and CW. 
These are close to 500 mile distances. I did hear a bunch of stations on DIGI 
mode who could not hear me. I kept looking at the wattmeter as I figured that 
maybe my PA had failed. It never did and it pumped out max power all weekend 
when I was on. Still I was amazed at what I heard and could not work on the 
digi modes. I think some receives could use an engineering update. I did snag 
KE4WMH/R on 222, who was down in FM17 on early Sunday evening when the band was 
stinko. I had to call for quite awhile to get his attention, but eventually he 
turned his antenna and we completed. That was nice. I ended up with the 
following
score:

BAND  QSO  GRID

144        4          2

222        61        34

432        52        27

Due to the slow nature of the September contest these days, I was participating 
with a half hearted radio effort timewise, and spent most of Saturday and 
Sunday afternoon working on removing antenna tower debris from the site. My 
hilltop now looks like a scrap metal yard with all the bent and broken towers.  
when things seemed slow on the band, i turned off the generator and went to 
work outside. I accomplished a lot and rigged things up to get the last 90 ft 
of Rohn 45 out of the tree limbs. I had 90 ft of Rohn 45 up about 25 to 30 ft 
in trees where it fell. As of today, I was able to lower them all to ground 
level, all 90ft worth!! I used several boat winches and heavy aircraft cable.   
I even hauled rocks to fill in the woods road up to the shack.  So between the 
manual labor and the contest, I was a busy boy.

73

Dave K1WHS


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>