[3830] N7GP CQ 160 SSB (Long)
Milt Jensen, N5IA
miltj at aepnet.com
Wed Mar 3 02:14:33 EST 1999
Call used: N7GP Location: AZ, USA CQ Zone: 3
Category: Single Op Single Band Mode: PHONE Power: 1500
Callsign of Operator: N5IA Exchanged Information: N7GP RS
Arizona
Hours of Operation: 31:00 Average QSOs per hour: 29
Band QSOs Points States & Provinces DX Final Score
160 647 1510 X 53 + 14 = 101,170
DX worked: 7-XE, KP4, 4-KH6, V4, ZF, VK, 2-KL7, P4, G, GJ, EA, EA8,
KP2, YV
Equipment: Yaesu FT-1000 MP, Alpha 91b, (the XZ1N station) 1/4
wavelength wire vertical with base at 70' AGL, full
size dipole at 250' & 8, 2 wavelength Beverages.
Operating from the Lazy B Ranch in the Pinaleno Mountains
of southeastern Arizona, 60 miles north of the Mexico
border and 7 miles west of the New Mexico state line.
Highlights: Being called by GJ2D. Making TX antenna comparisons.
Low lights: Having the earphones jumping around on the operating table
1.5 hours before sunset the 2nd night due to static
crashes.
As many have expressed already, the QRN was extremely heavy both nights. I
thank all the stations that stuck with me for 6 to 10 overs so that I could
piece together their callsign and get a "roger, QSL". I also apologize to
the many stations who I was unable to copy, or that I did not hear at all
and continued CQing in your face.
This was an enjoyable outing with the primary intention of comparing the
performance of a high dipole to a 1/4 wavelength ground plane. The results
were nothing short of astonishing.
The primary support for both antennas was a 250 foot high steel tower. The
dipole was constructed of # 12 solid copperweld and was mounted with the
feedpoint at the top of the tower. The ends were supported by small rope
anchored 1,000 feet away from the tower. The axis of the dipole was
basically east/west.
The vertical was constructed of wire with the vertical 1/4 wavelength
element composed of a 6 wire, 4 inch diameter circular cage of # 14
stranded copperweld. The base insulator was made of 1/2 inch teflon plate.
There were 14, 120 foot long radials made of # 12 stranded copper.
The vertical was suspended from a 3/16 inch steel catenary wire and spaced
1/4 wavelength distant from the tower on the northeast side. The catenary
was anchored approximately 1,000 feet distant from the tower with
approximately 800 lbs of tension. The base of the vertical was 70 feet
above ground and the radials sloped down and outward at nearly a 45 degree
angle. The radials were tied off to rocks at ground level.
In advance let me say that the dipole was no slouch of an antenna. It was
a full size dipole mounted 1/2 wavelength above dry, rocky, high desert
terrain. During the CQ 160 CW test in January this antenna in this position
worked 26 DX countries. The following is a copy of the notes that I made
during the contest when I asked stations to give me a comparison report of
the signals received at their location as I did an A/B transmit test. I
would switch between each antenna making a 2-3 second transmission on each,
for a total of 3-4 times back and forth. A previously stated, the results
were amazing.
To put things in proper perspective time wise, sunset was at 0100 Z and
sunrise was at 1400 Z. I tried to use stronger stations at different
distances, azimuths, and times of day with emphasis on early evening and
late morning when the band was opening and closing. If anyone wants to
compute the distances, I am located in DM52.
A real note is that the two stations that reported no difference (Sonora,
Mexico and Tucson, AZ) and the one station who reported the dipole better
(40 miles north of Tucson, AZ) are all southwest of my location. As noted
above, the ground plane was suspended 1/4 wavelength from the tower on the
northeast side of the tower in the hope that the tower would act as a
reflector and create a cardiod pattern with a null to the south west.
These reports indicate that may have been the case. However, I was called
by and worked VK3IO. I was being called by VK4WE (told to me by another
station only 200 miles from me whom I let work the VK4) but I could not
hear a whisper from him. The reason for mentioning this is that VK is the
same Azimuth from my location as Tucson and Sonora, Mexico, the direction
the planned null in the verticals radiation pattern.
Here are the reports with the exact words of the reporting station. Thanks
to all these stations for taking the time to run the test with me and give
me a report.
QSO TIME STATION LOCATION COMMENTS
4 22:37z N0KOV Kansas Barely copy on the Dipole. Booming in on
Vertical.
5 23:00z AA7US central AZ Vertical by 1.5 S units.
6 23:05z N0AH Wyoming Couldn't hear me on the Dipole.
8 23:24z NF7E N central AZ Almost couldn't hear me on the Dipole.
Flagstaff, AZ.
12 23:45z N7DF central NM Vertical 5 over 9. Dipole just under 9.
17 23:59z XE2SOZ NW Mexico No difference in Sonora, Mexico.
18 00:00z WI7J SW Utah Vertical better near St. George, UT.
20 00:02z K6SE So Calif Vertical 1 S unit better.
26 00:15z KJ6EO California Vertical 3 DB Stronger.
28 00:17z KE6GX West AZ 15 DB better on the Vertical in Lake Havasu
City.
29 00:18z K6HNZ California Vertical much better in Northern California.
31 00:22z K2UOP West Virg Could not hear me on the dipole.
54 00:59z N7JW SW Utah S9 on vertical. S6 on Dipole. Southern Utah.
59 01:08z W3TS Pennsylvania Cannot copy on the dipole.
63 01:17z KD9SV Indiana Vertical is 5 S units better.
176 03:57z N7CK S central AZ 5 db better on the dipole.
245 06:24z WA6CDR Los Angeles 15 db down on the dipole vs vertical.
250 06:35z KH6CC Hawaii Vertical 1 S unit better.
417 14:15z N0AH Wyoming The vertical 6 S units better in Wyoming.
Start the 2nd night
419 01:02z K0UO Kansas S7 on dipole and 10 over 9 on vertical.
424 01:32z N6LU California Vertical +15 and dipole +5 over S 9.
460 03:05z W7HSG Tucson, AZ Absolutely no difference between the
vertical and dipole.
519 05:11z AL7DJ Alaska Two S units better on the vertical. W7MT in
Oregon same.
597 09:55z WW1WW Massachusetts Vertical has a slight edge.
607 10:22z KH6E Hawaii Vertical is 2 S units better.
621 11:40z N0MLJ Minnesota 3-4 dB stronger on vertical & W9CH in
Illinois says
vertical also 1 S unit stronger in IL.
624 11:43z WA2PCS Pennsylvania Vertical better by 1 S unit.
625 11:48z K8EIG Ohio Vertical 10 dB better.
626 11:56z K3KO Nor Carolina 10 dB better in NC, now in daylight there.
630 12:02z N4JF Alabama 10 db better on the vertical.
632 12:04z K5OE Texas Vertical slightly better.
633 12:05z W3UHP Pennsylvania 10 dB better on the vertical.
637 12:12z W8RCM Michigan Vertical is 2 S units better. Now in daylight.
646 12:35z KG8HD Michigan Vertical better copy. Now in daylight.
647 12:36z WA0MHB Minnesota Vertical 3 S units better.
654 13:06z KB5ITH Oklahoma Vertical 20 over & dipole is 10 over 9.
I am also amazed when reading some of the other 3830 reports regarding time
operated and QSOs per hour. I can assure you that it is not possible to
achieve those Q counts and Q/HR rates from the southwest USA, even with a
high performance station. The following is a copy of my Q/HR report.
There is NO off time during each night operating period. This was a full
bore, all out effort to achieve the highest score possible.
NIGHT ONE NIGHT TWO
UTC rate total UTC rate total
22Z 4 4
23Z 12 16
00Z 38 54 00Z 1 415
01Z 46 100 01Z 8 423
02Z 40 140 02Z 28 451
03Z 36 176 03Z 21 472
04Z 29 205 04Z 32 504
05Z 31 236 05Z 26 530
06Z 30 266 06Z 30 560
07Z 25 291 07Z 14 574
08Z 26 317 08Z 5 579
09Z 12 329 09Z 7 586
10Z 17 346 10Z 12 598
11Z 32 378 11Z 15 612
12Z 23 401 12Z 23 636
13Z 8 409 13Z 6 642
14Z 5 647
It may also be of interest to know where we get our Q count from out here
in the southwest. The California guys and gals are the # 1 providers, a
full 17% with 109 Qs. Thanks.
Mult QSOs Mult QSOs Mult QSOs Mult
QSOs
CT 5 AL 8 CA 109 CO 20
MA 10 FL 10 AZ 61 IA
3
ME 6 GA 6 ID 4 KS 9
NH 4 KY 10 MT 5 MN 18
RI -- NC 9 NV 9 MO 11
VT -- SC 2 OR 10 NE 4
NJ 11 TN 8 UT 19 ND --
NY 14 VA 12 WA 17 SD 4
DE -- AR 7 WY 7 NS 1
DC -- LA 5 MI 17 QU 2
MD 6 MS 2 OH 22 ON 4
PA 18 NM 9 WV 5 MB 3
OK 9 IL 19 SK 2
TX 48 IN 8 AB 7
WI 10 BC 4
NF 1
LB, YT,
PEI, NWT = 0
I hope this report is of some interest and contains helpful information for
the many Topband operators around the world. Permission is given in
advance to Bill, W4ZV, to post any and all parts to the Topband reflector
if he so desires.
73 de Milt, N5IA, operator at N7GP
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/3830faq.html
Submissions: 3830 at contesting.com
Administrative requests: 3830-REQUEST at contesting.com
Problems: owner-3830 at contesting.com
More information about the 3830
mailing list