[3830] RAC Day KK7S SOAB/CW LP

webform at b41h.net webform at b41h.net
Sun Jul 1 20:22:45 PDT 2012


                    RAC Canada Day Contest

Call: KK7S
Operator(s): KK7S
Station: KK7S

Class: SOAB/CW LP
QTH: WA
Operating Time (hrs): 10
Radios: SO2R

Summary:
 Band  CW Qs  Ph Qs  CW Mults  Ph Mults
----------------------------------------
  160:    5              2          
   80:   22              4          
   40:  128              8          
   20:  150             11          
   15:   15              3          
   10:                              
    6:                              
    2:                              
----------------------------------------
Total:  320     0       28         0  Total Score = 49,000

Club: Western Washington DX Club

Comments:

I was looking forward to this contest as a great way to test out a couple of new
antennas -- my 160m inv-L and a 50' 80m vertical both using K2AV FCPs.  They
seemed to play quite well, though there really wasn't enough traffic on those
bands to give them a real go.  

I mean, wow, those conditions were truly amazing. Terrible, that is.  15m
opened up for a few, quick spotlights and 20m was mostly just weak -- like
someone stuffed the ionosphere with cotton.  No point in mentioning 10m.  

40m was pretty solid, but didn't get really strong until too late -- the east
coasters had mostly moved to 80m or gone to bed.  Unfortunately, 80m didn't
ever open up long the way I was hoping, so most of the QSOs there were within
1000 miles.  

160m was quiet and sounded really good for <1000 mile signals, but very few
seemed to try it.  When all the other bands have gone down the sh***er, why not
give 160m a try?  It can surprise you.

I was using a new 40m wire moxon this weekend.  It's strung up inv-V style,
with the apex at about 50'.  It worked great and now that I figured out how to
model insulation in 4nec2, I was able to cut the wires only once!  No trimming.
 Perfect target resonance on the first try.  Gotta love technology.

Oh, if you've read this far, I might as well also let you know that I was
trying out a Pixel loop receiving antenna on 80m and 160m.  It worked very well
-- performing roughly the same as my psuedo-ewe but with a smidge less noise. 
The only problem with it is that my 80m tx signal totally overloads its pre-amp
(even though it's furthest from my 80m tx antenna) so it's useless for rx on
160m while actively transmitting on 80m.  So now I have to work out a good way
to switch between the pixel and my ewe...  No end to the projects, eh?

I have another antenna to build and a bunch of micro-controller programming and
soldering to do in order to get my antenna switching under control. I've got my
fingers crossed, I'm knocking on wood, and I'm throwing salt over my shoulder
in a desperate attempt to ensure condx are better for NAQP.  I hope to see you
all in that one.

73,
-Chadd KK7S


Posted using 3830 Score Submittal Forms at: http://www.hornucopia.com/3830score/


More information about the 3830 mailing list