[3830] CQWW VHF KR1ST SOAB HP
webform at b4h.net
webform at b4h.net
Mon Jul 20 11:55:12 EDT 2020
CQ Worldwide VHF Contest - 2020
Call: KR1ST
Operator(s): KR1ST
Station: KR1ST
Class: SOAB HP
QTH: FN21
Operating Time (hrs):
Summary:
Band QSOs Mults
-------------------
6: 120 57
2: 49 21
-------------------
Total: 169 78 Total Score = 17,004
Club: Mt Airy VHF Radio Club
Comments:
Rig: IC-7300, IC-9700
Pwr: 1000W (6m), 800W (2m)
Ants: M2 6M3, M2 2M9SSB
Due to a family emergency I was only able to work the contest for a few hours
here and there. I missed the most productive hours, and no doubt the best
openings.
So this is what a digital mode VHF contest looks like, and probably what all VHF
contests will turn into. Don't get me wrong, I like digital mode contests, but
unless contest sponsors wake up and smell the coffee, the traditional modes will
disappear from these contests. Perhaps that is OK with them, as I don't see any
movement by the CQ WW, the ARRL, or any other US based organisation doing
anything to stop this from happening. The ARRL moves at a snail's pace and
probably won't see this coming until a few years after it happened, we know
that, but perhaps CQ WW could take the lead and improve things for VHF
contesting. We really need separate contests for Machine Generated Modes, as the
RSGB likes to call them. It seems other national Amateur Radio organizations
have understood this quite some time ago, but on this side of the Atlantic and
Pacific we seem to be apprehensive of trying something new. Maybe the ARRL and
the CQWW are just fine with this transformation of VHF contests into MGM
contests, and proudly point at participation rates while in fact they have done
absolutely nothing to contribute to these higher participation rates. Going by
number of logs entered alone is really like putting blinders on yourself.
One thing I wish VHF operators would learn from the HF crowd is that in order to
be productive in digital modes, you need to abandon FT8 in favor of FT4. I for
one think that FT8 is way too slow, and I don't know about you, it is really
testing my patience. Only use FT8 for what it is meant for. It is just too silly
though, almost comical, that everyone is cramming themselves into a 2800Hz
channel running large arrays and kW's. Well, two things we can learn from the HF
crowd (and probably a lot more), spread out! 50.313 is hopefully not the only
frequency your radio will tune to. Move below or above .313 when it gets too
crowded. The HF digital mode contesters learned this lesson many decades ago and
it works just fine.
More than in previous contests, I found myself deleting QSO's after they were
logged because QSO's were not completed. I also noticed a number of stations
that were transmitting on both 6 and 2 meters at the same time. Perhaps another
thing we should make folks aware of is that it is perfectly fine to work dupes.
There are no penalties.
Off my soap box now. Nobody reads this anyway. :)
Thanks everyone for the Q's. I really did have fun. I'm looking forward to
working everyone in the 222MHz and up contest.
73,
--Alex KR1ST
Band Mode QSOs Pts Grd Pt/Q
50 FT4 30 30 20 1.0
50 FT8 78 78 30 1.0
50 USB 12 12 7 1.0
144 FT8 44 88 17 2.0
144 USB 5 10 4 2.0
Total Both 169 218 78 1.3
Score: 17,004
1 Mult = 2.2 Q's
Posted using 3830 Score Submittal Forms at: http://www.3830scores.com/
More information about the 3830
mailing list