[AMPS] parasitic suppressors

Bob Marston k1ta@earthlink.net
Thu, 02 Jan 1997 23:36:34 -0800

At 06:24 PM 12/11/97 EST, you wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Dec 1997 22:03:58 +0000 "Ian White, G3SEK"
><G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk> writes:
>>Rich Measures wrote:
>>>If the paper is unsigned, receiving a copy of it would 
>>>not reveal the author.
>>It doesn't matter which individuals first wrote the bulletin, 
>>on the draft, authorized its release and so on...  You have to accept
>>that the statements in the Application Bulletin as published represent
>>the views of the EIMAC company. 
>>You can't try to pick-off and discredit individual EIMAC employees one
>>by one.
>A statement that needed to be made Ian.....Thanks.
>73   CArl   KM1H

Huh?   Are you saying that if there is a legitimate reason to question a
statement that we should suspend our skepticism and accept it at face value
because it was made on the letterhead of a major tube manufacturer????

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm