[AMPS] Plate RFC choke design

[Rich Measures]

>Hi Guys....   Just one comment
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Rich Measures [SMTP:measures@vc.net]
>Sent:	Friday, March 27, 1998 6:06 AM
>
>.............
>
>That's the popular, traditional, cherished, old theory, at least.
>However, orienting two coils end-to-end seemed to me like it would
>enhance coupling, not decoupling.  .  I built various hv rf chokes to see
>check the cherished theory out.   I observed that chokes wound with the
>supposed anti-resonance gaps have pretty much the same resonances as a
>same-L choke wound without gaps.
>
>[Richard W. Ehrhorn]  ...... Agreed 100% emphatically, Rich. I wonder if 
>anyone ever really analyzed the old variable-diameter and/or multi-section 
>chokes.
>
I never tested a variable-diameter design.  //  It looks to me like your 
e-mailer is not doing attribute marks correctly at the beginning of each 
line.

cheers
Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm