[AMPS] Re: Parasitics
Ian White, G3SEK
G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk
Fri, 15 May 1998 18:24:28 +0100
Jon Ogden wrote:
>>But here we go again...
>>
>>0. This is a demonstration of an impedance transformation effect, so
>>we're going to assume ideal component behavior.
>
>Ok, thanks for this one. Now I understand, Ian. Ignore my last one.
Not quite sure which was the last one (my mail software shows list
messages in subject relationship) so please nudge me if I seem to have
ignored the wrong one!
> I
>hadn't sat down and worked the math. Shame on me.
...but it wasn't you who had imperiously ordered me to produce the
math.
>I appreciate the time you took to show all that. I see what you are
>saying now. It makes sense too.
No problem - you're open-minded enough to recognize proof when you see
it.
73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm