[AMPS] FW: Mail failure
Gilmer, Mike
mgilmer@gnlp.com
Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:42:11 -0500
Yup - still getting it John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Fielding [SMTP:johnf@futurenet.co.za]
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 1999 12:00 PM
> To: Gilmer, Mike; 'AMPS'
> Subject: Re: [AMPS] FW: Mail failure
>
> Nope - keep getting it as well?
>
> John ZS5JF
>
> ----------
> > From: Gilmer, Mike <mgilmer@gnlp.com>
> > To: 'AMPS' <amps@contesting.com>
> > Subject: [AMPS] FW: Mail failure
> > Date: 01 February 1999 04:02
> >
> >
> > Anybody know what this Mail Failure means?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: HAYDEN/GEGPO7/POSTMASTER
> > > [SMTP:IMCEAMS-HAYDEN_GEGPO7_POSTMASTER@az25ms.mot.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 01, 1999 8:21 AM
> > > To: Gilmer, Mike
> > > Subject: Mail failure
> > >
> > >
> > > [002] Mail was received that was addressed to unknown addresses.
> > > Mail item was not delivered to:
> > > HAYDEN/GEGPO7/P04235
> > >
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ------
> > > --
> > > Microsoft Mail v3.0 IPM.Microsoft Mail.Note
> > > From: Gilmer, Mike
> > > To: 'AMPS'
> > > Subject: RE: [AMPS] duplicate copies
> > > Date: 1999-02-01 06:29
> > > Priority: 3
> > > Message ID: ECC4E311FCB7D21180CC00805F77919A
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have been getting double postings for a while, although (only)
> some
> > > can be explained by them being "legit" postings to multiple
> > > reflectors.
> > > Of course, some messages are posted to AMPS and CCed to
> subscribing
> > > individuals; seems a waste...
> > >
> > > But ever since the ARRL/QST/CW thing I get mail failures and
> > > misdirected
> > > deliveries. Never saw these before.
> > > Thought I was getting paid back, too. Maybe we are! :o)
> > >
> > > Mike N2MG
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andy Wallace [SMTP:andywallace@home.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, January 31, 1999 10:17 AM
> > > > To: Phil T. (VE3OZZ)
> > > > Cc: amps@contesting.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [AMPS] duplicate copies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Phil--
> > > >
> > > > I'm getting them--I thought I was getting "paid back" for
> continuing
> > > > the
> > > > CW discussion :-) :-). People's minds seem to be made up--I'm
> going
> > > to
> > > > give it a rest.
> > > >
> > > > Andy K5VM
> > > >
> > > > Phil T. (VE3OZZ) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, it isn't just me getting 2 copies of some posts. Larry
> > > > "sheepdip"
> > > > > Ravlin and Doug W9IIX are also getting 'em.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, has anyone just recently started getting bull sh1t "mail
> > > > failure"
> > > > > messages when replying or posting to the reflector ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Phil T
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> > > > > Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> > > > > Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > > > > Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> > > > > Search:
> > > http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> > > > Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> > > > Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > > > Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> > > > Search:
> http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> > >
> > > --
> > > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> > > Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> > > Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > > Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> > > Search:
> http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> >
> > --
> > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> > Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> > Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm