[AMPS] revisited duty cycle...

[John Fielding]

Methinks something funny with that meter!!

John	ZS5JF

----------
> From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
> To: nospam4me@juno.com; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [AMPS] revisited duty cycle...
> Date: 24 July 1999 12:09
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >>> €  Continuous is way different from SSB's 15% avg, duty cycle.  
> >
> >> Too right, Rich. SSB lets you get away with a lot of sins
> >
> >Amateur Radio Contest and Net Operators using SSB often have >35% avg
> >duty cycle thanks to the invention and improper use of a Speech
> >Processor. 
> >
> €  I know a proud owner of a SB-200 who has a speech processor that 
> allows him to talk-up the plate current slightly higher than the plate 
> current he is able to obtain during key-down tune-up.   Is it possible to 
> have a 103% duty cycle? 
> >.......
> 
> 
> Rich...
> 
> R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm