[AMPS] revisited duty cycle...

[Rich Measures]

>
>Methinks something funny with that meter!!
>
€  Hearing was believing, John
>
>----------
>> From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>> To: nospam4me@juno.com; amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [AMPS] revisited duty cycle...
>> Date: 24 July 1999 12:09
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> >
>> >>> €  Continuous is way different from SSB's 15% avg, duty cycle.  
>> >
>> >> Too right, Rich. SSB lets you get away with a lot of sins
>> >
>> >Amateur Radio Contest and Net Operators using SSB often have >35% avg
>> >duty cycle thanks to the invention and improper use of a Speech
>> >Processor. 
>> >
>> €  I know a proud owner of a SB-200 who has a speech processor that 
>> allows him to talk-up the plate current slightly higher than the plate 
>> current he is able to obtain during key-down tune-up.   Is it possible to 
>> have a 103% duty cycle? 
>> >.......
>> 
>> 
>> Rich...
>> 
>> R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>



Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm