[AMPS] slam tally

Rich Measures measures@vc.net
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:38:55 -0700




>
>Dale wrote:
>
>>      Well, I just have to say this. Tom, your slams are just way too
>>      personal and I really don't like it. I will hang in here if you just
>>      keep it to a non-personal technical disagreement.Otherwise I'm out of
>>      here man.
>
>Your choice.
>As my dad used to say, "don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way
>out"
>
>> Life is just too short for that kind of crap. Makes
>>      everybody feel bad.
>
>So far I've avoided any need for therapy.
>
>
>>     I have kept a pretty good tally and so far Rich has my vote for being 
in the lead.
>
>You seem to have a preference, that's OK, it just means you have a slant on
>this just as we all do!
>
> > I.E. - Tom you should check your
>>      quiver before attempting intellectual battle.
>
>I think think Toms quiver is well stocked.
>
€  Dan:  Do you agree with Mr. Rauch's assertation that traditional AC 
circuit-analysis is not valid for analyzing current division in a  L/R  
parasitic-oscillation suppressor?


Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm