R: R: [AMPS] You gotta read this....

[Maurizio Panicara]

Pete,

the argument is already closed for me. I did astray, but if I'm not in
error, in the first posting about this topic there was no sign those amp
were not built for communications.

73,
Mauri I4JMY

By the way, You've done a nice job with your contest stations data base !



-----Messaggio Originale-----
Da: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
A: <amps@contesting.com>
Data invio: giovedì 14 ottobre 1999 21.54
Oggetto: Re: R: [AMPS] You gotta read this....


> I don't think there is any serious dispute that if linearity is
unimportant
> and an amplifier need only sustain key-down conditions for a few seconds,
> then lots of things are possible.  It looks to me as if the major
technical
> challenge these guys face is designing portable motor-driven power sources
> that can supply enough juice for even a short time.
>
> 73,  Pete N4ZR
> Sometimes a tower is just a tower
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm