[AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?

K0FF K0FF@ARRL.NET
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:57:19 -0500


Bill Brown, W0SYK (SK) built a ton of amplifiers in his day, and he was
convinced that a wide silver plated copper strap was all that was needed in
lieu of a plate suppresser. All I know is that his stuff really worked, and
wherever the York 5000's are today, are probably still working FB. George,
K0FF
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Clements <philk5pc@tyler.net>
To: N6BUU@aol.com <N6BUU@aol.com>; 2@vc.net <2@vc.net>; n6er@yahoo.com
<n6er@yahoo.com>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?


>
>>  Ameritron does it right, but alas, no anode parasitic suppressor!
>>
>>  (((73)))
>>  Phil, K5PC >>
>> IT SEEMS TO ME THAT MAKES EVEN LESS SENCE!           HANK
>
>The designer of the Ameritron AL-1500 has stated here on this reflector
>that it is possible through proper lay-out and component selection to
>preclude the need for anode parasitic suppression on 8877 amps.
>
>Please turn off your caps lock, Hank..it is perceived as shouting on the
>reflector. I don't think you are  mad at me, are you???
>
>(((73)))
>Phil, K5PC
>
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com