[AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?

[measures]

>
>Bill Brown, W0SYK (SK) built a ton of amplifiers in his day, and he was
>convinced that a wide silver plated copper strap was all that was needed in
>lieu of a plate suppresser. All I know is that his stuff really worked, and
>wherever the York 5000's are today, are probably still working FB. George,
>K0FF

€  what is ''really worked''?
thanks

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Phil Clements <philk5pc@tyler.net>
>To: N6BUU@aol.com <N6BUU@aol.com>; 2@vc.net <2@vc.net>; n6er@yahoo.com
><n6er@yahoo.com>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:39 PM
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?
>
>
>>
>>>  Ameritron does it right, but alas, no anode parasitic suppressor!
>>>
>>>  (((73)))
>>>  Phil, K5PC >>
>>> IT SEEMS TO ME THAT MAKES EVEN LESS SENCE!           HANK
>>
>>The designer of the Ameritron AL-1500 has stated here on this reflector
>>that it is possible through proper lay-out and component selection to
>>preclude the need for anode parasitic suppression on 8877 amps.
>>
>>Please turn off your caps lock, Hank..it is perceived as shouting on the
>>reflector. I don't think you are  mad at me, are you???
>>
>>(((73)))
>>Phil, K5PC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>


-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com