[AMPS] Re: Poor Science

[measures]

>
>Actually, I subscribe to this list specifically to read the banter between
>Rich and Tom..  

Without Tom, there are fewer posts. Without a protagonist and an 
antagonist, this place would be downtown Snoresville.  

>I have learned a great deal from the both of them - some of
>it not always good, but I wouldn't have it any other way...
>
I have learned that denial of reality is a more serious problem than I 
once thought.  

>However, I prefer it when the retorts include actual data and reproducible
>situations.  

Amen.  Ad hominem terms like ''poor science'' are vacuous.   .  . 

>I would have to conclude that both of these individuals have
>made positive contributions to my understanding of amplifier design.
>
Have you checked out Mr. Rauch's Web site and *QST* articles?
>
cheers, Don
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Charles T Johnston [mailto:charles@ab7sl.com]
>Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 3:53 PM
>To: Terry Gaiser - W6RU; measures; AMPS
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: Poor Science
>
>
>
>What has really enhanced this list for me is to add a kill filter for
>Measures and Rauch.  Now I get meaningful interesting posts without the
>pathetic sideshow of bruised and battered egos.   

Tell us there is nothing interesting about a guy whose ego is such that 
he puts himself on his list of ''recognized  experts'' (9/94 QST, p.71).

>This is a great list
>when those two are filtered out.

Sounds like maybe you are still sneaking peeks at the bad boys.  .  
.....
cheers, Charles

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm