[AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible

[Jan.E.Holm@telia.se]

     Not important in this case since NB was OFF.

     de SM2EKM

      PS: Think we are loosing track a bit, need to get 
      back up on the road again.
------------------------------

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från:	itr@nanoteq.co.za [SMTP:itr@nanoteq.co.za]
Skickat:	 den 7 mars 2000 13:21
Kopia:	amps@contesting.com
Ämne:	VB: Re: [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible


What has not been mentioned in this discussion, is the performance of
noise blankers on amateur receivers, which when "in", contribute more
than their fair share of clicking noises to a strong signal, ala ICOM
IC746.

Ian ZS6BTE


Peter Chadwick wrote:
> 
> Craig says:
> Military receivers of the late 1980s had intercept points of
> around +30dbm
> 
> Receiver intercept point isn't everything.

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
 <<Fil: Re_ [AMPS] Re_ Re_ Mission Impossible.TXT>> 


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm