SV: [AMPS] Re: New G2DAF amplifier information

measures 2@vc.net
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 07:17:21 -0700


>
>No never give up, do you? Rich. Again: " the proof of the pudding is in the
>eating.......". It has been proofed many times that the DAF works and that
>is what counts, right?
>
I agree that the DAF config. works, Hans.  The total distortion level 
produced by the three DAFs I ''proofed''/measured was no better than 22 
db below PEP.  As long as one stays c. 25kHz from the amateur-service 
band edges, this sort of thing is quite legal.  However, my personal 
preference is to use amplifiers that have a total distortion level of 
-32db or better.  .  

later

>sooner............ de Hans SM5KI 
>----------
>>FrĀn: measures <2@vc.net>
>>Till: <Jan.E.Holm@telia.se>, "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>>Ÿmne: Re: [AMPS] Re:  New G2DAF amplifier information
>>Datum: ons 15 mar 2000 06.23
>>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Why the heck not? People I know runing G2DAF
>>>     amps do sound much better and also have less
>>>     bandwith then big time prominent hall of fame
>>>     contesters using  Alpha/Ameritron amps and
>>>     latest so called state of the art exciters. 
>>>     Whats wrong here?  
>>
>>You are not telling us the truth.  Running substantial grid current in 
>>grid-driven amps makes feculence as surely as the sun rises in the East 
>>and sets in the West.  On the other hand, for clearing a wide path, the 
>>DAF is unsurpassed.  . 
>>
>>cheers
>>......
>>
>>-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
>>end


-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm