[AMPS] FW: BOUNCE amps@contesting.com : Non-member submission from [Morel Grunberg <Q86@MISMAIL.MIS.ELEX.CO.IL>]

[2]

>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-amps@contesting.com [mailto:owner-amps@contesting.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:19 PM
>To: amps-approval@contesting.com
>Subject: BOUNCE amps@contesting.com : Non-member submission from [Morel
>Grunberg <Q86@MISMAIL.MIS.ELEX.CO.IL>]
>
>
>>From kn6dv@as.net Tue Jul  3 01:19:15 2001
>Received: from tparelay.telradnetworks.co.il ([62.90.58.229])
>	by contesting.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f635JBW31721
>	for <amps@contesting.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 01:19:12 -0400
>Received: from mailgw.telrad.co.il (mailgw.telrad.co.il [62.90.58.230])
>	by tparelay.telradnetworks.co.il (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA00920
>	for <amps@contesting.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:14:07 +0300 (IDT)
>Received: from tpamail.telradnetworks.co.il ([141.226.78.5])
> by mailgw.telrad.co.il (NAVIEG 2.1 bld 63) with SMTP id
>M2001070308125915878
> ; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 08:12:59 +0200
>Received: from tpa-mail1.telradnetworks.co.il
>(tpa-mail1.telradnetworks.co.il [141.226.76.57])
>	by tpamail.telradnetworks.co.il (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA22086;
>	Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:19:02 +0300 (IDT)
>Received: by tpa-mail1.telradnetworks.co.il with Internet Mail Service
>(5.5.2650.21)
>	id <LAYPAZDT>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:18:03 +0200
>Message-ID:
><7388365BE5E4D411A3810002A50915587363AD@mail3.telradnetworks.co.il>
>From: Morel Grunberg <Q86@MISMAIL.MIS.ELEX.CO.IL>
>To: "'chuck'" <k8cpa@arrl.net>, amps@contesting.com
>Subject: RE: [AMPS] ACOM Amps
>Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:21:13 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>Hi Chuck,
>
>Could you explain what exactly are the reasons you beleive that ?
>
>73
>Morel
>4X1AD
>
/\   For one thing QRO Amplifiers often come with a circuit diagram that 
does not match what's inside the amplifier.  This makes troubleshooting 
QRO amplifiers way more fun. 

cheers, Morel

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:	chuck [SMTP:k8cpa@arrl.net]
>> Sent:	Mon July 02 2001 19:22
>> To:	amps@contesting.com
>> Subject:	Re: [AMPS] ACOM Amps
>>
>>
>> QRO Amps are better. Period.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>


-  R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com