[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc

[Richard]

>http://www.arrl.org/files/infoserv/rib/part97.txt
>
>http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/part97.pdf
>
>http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/
>
>I had a problem with the last URL I posted for FCC Rules and Regs .... the
>above gives you three choices.
>Terry W6RU
>

Thanks, Terry.  I can find nothing definitive in the Part 97 rules since 
the bandwidth of a "communications quality A3E emission" is not defined.


>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Richard" <2@mail.vcnet.com>
>To: "Roger D. Johnson" <n1rj@pivot.net>; "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:17 AM
>Subject: Re: [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc
>
>
>
>
>>?  As long as rotten splatter doesn't go outside the band, it is not
>>against the Part 97 rules.
>>
>>Not True! See Part 97 - section 307a
>>
>?  I have an old copy of 97, but paragraph D defines excessive splatter
>as that which is outside the amateur radio band in use.  If an AM signal
>can legally be 12kHZ wide, so can a SSB, DSB or an FM signal.  W6CHR's
>G2DAF amp was several times wider than 12kHZ and he was never cited.
>-  Is part 97 available on the Web ?
>
>cheerz, Roger
>
>-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K,
>www.vcnet.com/measures.
>end
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
>


-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, 
www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end