[Amps] Part 97

Richard 2@mail.vcnet.com
Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:16:40 -0800


>
>Richard said: "97.307 would not hold water in Fed. court."
>
> 
>Rich, I would not bet my license on it if I were you.  It is the law.  The 
>FCC is authorized by Congress to make rules and regulations.  As amateurs, 
>we have agreed to abide by their rules.  Sometimes we might disagree with 
>them, but our right to operate an amateur station is not protected by the 
>Constitution.  We are licensed and the license may be revoked by the FCC.
>
€  Name a transceiver that has a 40db down total IM distortion level. 

>I have been licensed to practice law for over 30 years.  I am a member of 
>the United States Supreme Court Bar and the Federal Court and the U.S Tax 
>Court.  You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but I consider it 
>wrong.  
> 
>Colin   K7FM  
> 
>--- COLIN LAMB
>
>--- k7fm@teleport.com
>
>--- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>text/html (html body -- converted)
>---
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, 
www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end