[AMPS] SB-220

[Jim Strohm]

"Paul - VE3ZT" <VE3ZT@rac.ca> writes --

>>Haven't tried the 50 wpm approach. Is it because it's easier on the tube(s)?
>>
>*  Yes, and it allows an accurate tuneup with a power supply that won't
>maintain anode supply  V with AŘ.


IIRC, Rich is the instigator of the notorious 555-based "pulser" tuning
device, AKA "The Death Ray" at this QTH.  A very useful aid for tuning.

Jim N6OTQ



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com