Steve Katz wrote: > > Vic, I think he meant SB230. It's about same size as SB200 but lighter and > used a single conduction-cooled tube (8873 I think-?) with internal AC PS. Right, I saw '230' and for some reason (age, probably), read '220'. It is possibly lighter than the 200. On the other hand, those tubes are hard to find. Vic K2VCO