[Amps] Here's a Shocker

[Bill Fuqua]

Maybe when the FCC allows higher conductive signals for BPL  they can 
eliminate the  annoying 60Hz power line current and we can power everything 
in our homes by rectifying the RF.

73
Bill wa4lav



At 02:24 PM 11/15/2004 -0500, John Lawson wrote:


>   Usually I try to snip replies - but all this is relevant:
>
>
>
>On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 Dennis12Amplify at aol.com wrote:
>
>>
>>In a message dated 11/13/04 9:40:48 AM Central Standard Time,
>>dezrat1242 at ispwest.com writes:
>>
>>Which makes me wonder if it  wouldn't be good to have our AC power
>>lines run at about 1000 Hz or  so.  No more shocks, no more accidental
>>electrocutions.  The  worst that could happen would be a burn.
>>Something to think about,  eh?
>>
>>I know the arguments against it - transmission loss being the  most
>>significant - but someday when houses have their own little  nuclear
>>generators and are "off the grid" it might be something to  consider.
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>Actually, the power transmission would be much more efficient as the
>>transformers and capacitors could be made much smaller.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Dennis O.
>
>
>   With all due respect, and purely out of regard for your personal 
> safety, I *STRONGLY* suggest that both you gentelmen immediately suspend 
> all involvement with these items until you gain a better understanding of 
> basic AC theory and practice!!
>
>   In the first place, the adverse physiological effects of voltage on the 
> human body is due mainly to currents above a certain threshold across the 
> chest cavity and heart structures, clamping and spasm of muscles 
> resulting in tearing of tissues, and nerve damage/eradication.  Then 
> there are the burn phenomena, both resitive and RF induced.
>
>   These come into play at various points and severities, depending on the 
> amount of current dropped by the body, the path taken by the voltage, and 
> the frequencies (from DC to RF) as well as the voltage, and the duration 
> of the exposure.
>
>   Y'all *really* oughta read up on some basic electrical and RF safety - 
> I'm sacred for you.  I've lost friends in electrical accidents and it's 
> not the prettiest way to depart the planet.
>
>   As for power transmission being more efficient at higher line freqs: 
> look up "skin effect" and see how that tallies with your theory. High 
> frequencies travel more and more on the the surface of a conductor - 
> which is how microwaves use 'waveguide' (very basically).  Many times you 
> will see big HF coils wound with tubing - no use having all that copper 
> if it'll never see the currents.
>
>   Aircraft used to use 400 Htz to cut down on the iron/copper wieght - 
> but the most modern ships are all going to DC busses as the gear gets 
> smaller and more integrated.
>
>   Please do get a btter idea of these safety issues before you find out 
> the hard way.
>
>  Cheers
>
>John  KB6SCO
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps