[Amps] Advice on instruments for ham use
G3rzp at aol.com
G3rzp at aol.com
Fri Nov 26 16:20:08 EST 2004
In a message dated 26/11/2004 19:32:47 GMT Standard Time,
wa6fgi at sbcglobal.net writes:
What would be a good (cheap) analog (or digital ) scope to use for the sole
purpose of observing my transmitted signal?
And being I have zero experience with a scope, what would be the easiest
method of hooking it up?
What frequency? In the HF band, the easy way is a T piece and and a short
coax to the scope. If you're running the full gallon, you'll need an
attenuator, and that needs to be high impedance - a small series capacitor. A 50 ohm
attenuator will not do.
If you want to be 'posh', use a directional coupler. Take an aluminium box,
fir a pair of SO239 or N type or whatever. Cut a strip of metallised PC Board
about 0.18 inch wide for fibreglass 1/16 inch thick, and glue it (superglue)
so that reaches pretty well between the two sockets: connect each end to the
sockets.
Now cut another strip, and glue it parallel to the first, with about 1/8
inch separation. Connect one end to a BNC socket, and the other through a 47 ohm
metal film resistor to ground. Connect the tx to one end of the through line
and the antenna to the other. Connect the scope to the BNC. Fire up to 100w
atts, measure the volts on the scope. reverse the antenna and tx connections
and measure again. Connect so you get maximum on the scope.
Now you have a directional coupler, used 30 or 40 years ago for SWR
measurements. The coupled signal increases at 6dB per octave - i.e., going from 7 to
14 MHz for the same power, you'll get twice the voltage, but this shouldn't
be a problem. If it is, put in a series R, and parallel C combination to give
an inverse slope.
There was a book in France called ' La Radio - c'est plus simple' (Radio -
it's very easy)
Sometimes it's so. A French review of Scroggie's book 'Second Thoughts on
Radio Theory@ (highly recommended, by the way) suggested that perhaps it
should be called 'La radio - ca n'est pas si simple' (Radio isn't that easy). But
in this case, it is.
73
Peter G3RZP
More information about the Amps
mailing list