[Amps] Nuclear Magnetic Pulses

[carl seyersdahl]

 Unless I miss my guess , If your equipment is all solid state, you'd be
"dead in the water" unless , and even then , your equipment was 100%
"mil-spec" parts.!! Even today, I don't think our Govt. has the ability , or
anyone else either, to produce 100% EMP proof devices.
  It seems that the "old way" , with "vacuum tubes" (remember those ?) is
the only way around the problem !!!
   Just another oldtimer's thoughts.!!!
   carl / kz5ca
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Dennis12Amplify at aol.com>
To: <ka1xo at juno.com>; <Amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Nuclear Magnetic Pulses


>
> In a message dated 8/1/05 6:11:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ka1xo at juno.com
> writes:
>
> Mention  was made in recent posts about EMP.
>
> Other than lightning damage, which  can be relatively
> protected against by disconnection of antennae,  telephone
> lines, a.c. power lines, etc., what are the consequences
> of an  aerial nuclear burst in the ionosphere, and how
> can we protect out  equipment when not in use?
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Hal  Mandel
> W4HBM
>
>
>
> A Very Thick  Faraday Shield!
>
> Regards,
>
> Dennis  O.
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>