[Amps] Could we *all* use the right tube part numbers?

[Steve Thompson]

On Tuesday 15 February 2005 09:11, David Kirkby wrote:
> Steve Thompson wrote:
> >Bill L. Fuqua wrote:
> >>While you are at it.
> >>20 meters is not 14 mhz. that should be MHz
> >
> >or even 20 metres :-)
> >
> >As for commas and suffix letters in part numbers, I have other things to
> >worry about. To me it's only a problem if there's ambiguity
>
> Well it does as far as search engines are concerned.  Google interprets
> them differently with or without the commas. Trying to find data on the
> Eimac 3CX15,000B7  has problems, as Eimac's web page will not be found
> by Google unless you put the comma in. Yet it will return more hits
> without the comma, as most people do it wrong.

Putting it very simplistically, if someone hasn't the wits to find their way 
round such issues, they shouldn't be messing with things so dangerous. If you 
want academic precision in all things, this is not the place to be.

Steve