[Amps] QST

[Administrator]

OK, enough about QST and ARRL policies.  If people want to discuss 
the errors in an article, fine.  However, nothing said or done here 
is going to "fix" the ARRL.  It (the "professional management" and 
Board of Directors) is broken beyond all repair and they stopped 
working for the good of their members or the Amateur Service a 
long time ago.  

Time to get back on message and discuss amplifiers ... 


 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Harold Mandel
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 12:31 PM
> To: 'Bill Fuqua'; amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] QST
> 
> 
> [snip]
>      I am becoming more and more disgusted with the lack of technical 
> knowledge QST authors.  
> [snip]
> 
> Dear Bill, (et al),
> 
> QST authors are politically correct. They do not insult or cause
> consternation for any member or advertiser.
> 
> The articles need to be "sugar and spice."