[Amps] FW: Transformers

[Gary Schafer]

Peter,

You had it right the first time. PEP is the AVERAGE power at the crest of
the modulation envelope. Not the peak power.

73
Gary  K4FMX

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Peter Voelpel
> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 8:28 PM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: Transformers
> 
> PEP power IS the peak power measured as the crest of the envelope during
> one
> cycle, so your 400Vs measures the highest power available which IS the
> peak
> power.
> 
> It can only become less over more cycles while the power supply is soaked.
> 
> 
> 
> 73
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
>   _____
> 
> From: Gudguyham at aol.com [mailto:Gudguyham at aol.com]
> 
> 
> 
> The crest of the envelope in that example is 400V.
> Since 400V peak equal 282V effective, PEP power is 1600W not 3200W.
> 
> 
> 
>  The measurement was made with a scope and the highest peak was singled
> out
> and at that point the peak power was 3200 W, but looking at the complete
> wave including the low spots the PEP would be 1600 per definition.  Now I
> guess we have to ask Rich what he is driving at. To qualify my answer I
> would say that the peak power was 3200 W but the PEP power over the
> completed wave was 1600. W
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps